Gallagher v Ross: the case continues
The legal battle between Arthur J Gallagher and David Ross, Mark Mugge and Christopher Keey has grabbed the industry’s attention since Insurance Age broke the news about the court case in late March. Two months later, and with several documents published, the focus is on the claims, defences and counterclaims.
Acquisitions
Gallagher details that it was looking into the possibility of buying Towergate, Iridium and a 20% share in Autonet and that the three defendants diverted these opportunities by dealing with Highbridge and BAML on their own behalf from 8 December 2014.
In their defences, Ross, Mugge and Keey deny the accusations and claim that Gallagher was never going to go through with these deals including because the group board had put a $30m [£19.5m] threshold on acquisitions in May 2014.
M
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk