Aviva boss lists three reasons for fall in GI operating profits

david mcmillan aviva

Aviva's UK general insurance chief executive, David McMillan, said the dip in the insurers' general insurance and health operating profits was due to its decision to release fewer reserves this year.

The insurer's UK GI operating profit increased to £197m in the first half of 2010 (H1 2009: £159m), but when combined with the health division the results were less favourable, £268m compared to £284m last year.

Mr McMillan said: "The half-year results in 2009 versus 2010 show a fall in profit but underlying that are three things. Current year underwriting performance has improved significantly and we have released a lot less from previous years.

"In the first half of 2009 we released around

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

Polaris at 30 – Ray Vincent

As insurance industry owned Polaris celebrates its 30th birthday, Insurance Age asks experts for their recollections on the dawn of digital trading and what is coming next.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: