Insurers accused of ‘dragging feet’ as extra FCA BI September trial dates mooted

High Court London

The eight insurers involved in the test case are still on the hunt for their own expert evidence as a second trial in September is looking increasingly likely.

Insurers have continued to go against the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) intention to use the Cambridge Analysis as evidence in the business interruption test case.

The Cambridge Analysis is relied upon by the government and Public Health England in determining the rate of infection.

At a case management conference (CMC) on Friday 26 June, the eight insurers involved in the case opposed the use of the analysis because they have not been able to find an expert of their own.

It is likely

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Meet the MGA feature: Arc Legal 

Arc Legal CEO Lee Taylor outlines the value in having a supportive parent of the scale of AmTrust; and why it makes sense to keep an eye on legislation and social changes in order to innovate and develop new products.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: