Relief for brokers following Drake versus Provident
The recent Court of Appeal decision has highlighted the contentious issue of policy avoidance, resulting in limits being now imposed on insurers
The decision in the December 2003 case of Drake Insurance versus Provident Insurance brings welcome relief to brokers by limiting when insurers can avoid policies and in giving wider effect to the duty of utmost good faith in the favour of the insured.
The case revolved around a Mrs Kaur, whose car collided with a motorcyclist who suffered serious injuries as a result. The car belonged to her husband, Mr Singh, and was insured with Provident, with Mrs Kaur as a named driver.
She also had a policy
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk