Reportage: Decisions,decisions

choosing-a-tie

Giving policyholders freedom of choice to select which lawyer handles their BTE claim sounds positive, however Paul Jacobs argues that it could do more harm than good for the legal expenses market

From much of the wider coverage that the review received, brokers might be forgiven for thinking that Lord Justice Jackson's Review of Civil Litigation Costs was only concerned about the after-the-event (ATE) market. He certainly had no win, no fee agreements firmly in his sights when he wrote his 600-page report, and even went so far as to endorse before-the-event (BTE) legal protection as a means to provide access to justice. So, what have brokers got to be concerned about?

Insurance Age has

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: