Some economics of commercial market hardening

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Emmanuel KenningNow, as you may have guessed from my previous ramblings I'm no economist. And even I realise that reading too much into two sets of data this month could be dangerous but they really have got me thinking about the old chestnut that is commercial market hardening.

 

Firstly there was the news that the insolvency rate has started to increase again in the UK. I'm not quite sure how the figures are produced, but there were 36 "insurance" insolvencies in July 2011 which represented a 140% increase over July 2010.

 

For those who have lost their jobs it is clearly bad news and all brokers should be concerned by the overall increase in insolvency rates. Only businesses with more than 500 employees saw an improvement in their insolvency rate.

 

Not to labour the point, but if as a broker you are targeting SME business the pool is getting smaller. Every category, be it micro business such as 1-2 employees or at the larger end with 11-25 or 26-50 employees, saw more companies going out of business than this time last year.

 

You don't need me to tell you it is a tough market and getting tougher.

 

Combined operating ratios
Which brings me on to insurers and their combined operating ratios.

 

To pick a couple at random Ageas this week said its insurance COR was 100.5% for the first six months of 2011, an improvement on the first half of 2010 when it delivered 106.5%. And at the start of the month Aviva revealed a 96% COR, an improvement of 2% compared to the first half of 2010.

 

No names no pack drill, but I never quite understand why insurers often also put out a statement saying their COR 'would have been better without escape of water claims after the freeze' or 'the COR would have been 90% without the flood'.

 

I support Ipswich Town. We would have beaten Peterborough 1-0 if it wasn't for the 7 (seven) goals we let in.

 

Leaving that aside, if there is one phrase that is being repeated by insurers more than ever to us in the press, particularly in results season, it is "underwriting for profit".

 

To be fair to insurers their numbers show they are working hard to live up to their word. But in a market with insolvencies on the up it is difficult to see how much further they can push it.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Polaris at 30 – Ray Vincent

As insurance industry owned Polaris celebrates its 30th birthday, Insurance Age asks experts for their recollections on the dawn of digital trading and what is coming next.

JMG in quadruple deal swoop

JMG has snapped up four brokers, adding additional expertise in high-net-worth, commercial, motor trade, technical and specialist consultancy services to the Yorkshire-headquartered group, Insurance Age can reveal.

FSCS gives first insight on increasing levy to £394m

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has indicated its levy for 2025/26 will rise to £394m from £265m this financial year as it cited having lower surpluses to carry forward and offset bills – a factor that has benefited brokers for two years in a row.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: