Insurers wait for credit hire claims judgement.

Insurers are waiting to discover whether they are liable for credit hire claims, where the hire agre...

Insurers are waiting to discover whether they are liable for credit
hire claims, where the hire agreement is proven to be unenforceable. If
the judgement goes in their favour, it could result in savings of hundreds
of thousands of pounds.


The decision hangs on two separate legal cases, Dimond v Lovell and Benn v
Moore, which were first heard by the Court of Appeal in mid-March, but are
still unsettled. Both cases sought to establish whether a hirer could
claim from insurers for charges if the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

FSCS gives first insight on increasing levy to £394m

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has indicated its levy for 2025/26 will rise to £394m from £265m this financial year as it cited having lower surpluses to carry forward and offset bills – a factor that has benefited brokers for two years in a row.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: