Tribunal overturns CMA Most Favoured Nation clauses ruling and £17.9m Compare The Market fine
A Competition Appeal Tribunal has overturned a decision by the Competition and Markets Authority which was set to fine Compare the Market £17.9m for breaking competition rules on use of Most Favoured Nation clauses.
The CAT unanimously agreed with all the challenges to the decision outlined by Compare The Market and, as such, elected to set aside the original ruling.
The tribunal noted there were a number of grounds for overturning the 2020 decision. It found the decision to be “materially wrong” in relation to how the CMA arrived at a market definition and it also failed to establish that wMFNs [Wide Most Favoured Nation Clauses] had the anti-competitive effects articulated in its decision.
The CAT
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk